This morning on the train a woman was absolutely out of her mind. Likely under the influence of some mild expanding substances she was shouting nonsensical things to the train car in general. Since the local train police are essentially nonexistent, this is not an uncommon occurrence. Everyone ignored her. However, what was uncommon was as she got off the train she got into another lady’s face and started yelling at a complete stranger, essentially threatening her life for no reason.
This other lady then proceeded to let the crazy lady have it, and basically shouted her down asking her in very kind, appropriate language fit for a kindergarten what her problem was and to get away from her. Much to my surprise, this entire interaction greatly pleased the entire train car’s passengers. It seemed to make them happy to see this altercation, made their commute more exciting. Other complete strangers were talking about it with each other.
Why? Well, morning commutes are boring as shit. Plus, this crazy lady had been shouting for 20 minutes and so folks were probably pleased to see somebody hand her her ass. But, I have a twisted mind and so my other thoughts were that folks were just happy to see some kind of non-violent altercation as pure entertainment. It brought people together, complete strangers.
This is straight caveman shit. This is the ape part of our brains that loves to see a good scrum. Think evolution has solved us of this? Wrong. At times it seems the entire purpose of social media is to give people an outlet to express their rage at [insert anything here]. Instead of brawling with their neighbors in the market square over [insert anything here], they just output their rage on Twitter.
Not only is this unhealthy, it’s also weak. It’s really, really easy to threaten somebody’s life over a political issue when you’re not in the same room with them. It’s rather a different concept if you’re face to face. Let’s take an example of this.
1) Political Cult Acolyte 1 says to Political Cult Acolyte 2 over Twitter, “Fuck you, you’re wrong, my opinion is right. You deserve to die. I’ll kill you and all those like you, fucker.” A similar threat is returned. Nothing actually happens.
2) Political Cult Acolyte 1 says the same thing to Political Cult Acolyte 2, only face to face. Either the police are called, a fight ensues, or somebody is actually murdered.
If you ask me, (2) is more productive than (1). (1) allows the rage to continue, let’s people live in their own narcissistic bubble, permits people to endlessly be total assholes without consequence, and in the end solves nothing. Whereas with (2), the issue is resolved, one way or the other, immediately.
It’s time for a return to bloodsports. The Coliseum is still standing, just slightly upgrade that venue and let’s get back to our roots. The mandate is anytime somebody threatens somebody on the train, or on Twitter, it’s like a glove slap challenge. If the other human doesn’t accept, they can be branded as a coward or not serious in their beliefs regarding [insert anything here]. If they accept the challenge: Coliseum.
This can be live broadcasting like the Olympics or like any number of post-apocalyptic B movie from 1987. They don’t necessarily have to kill each other, just get the other opponent to submit. So I’m not necessarily advocating tridents and nets. Let them hit each other with plastic bats for all I care. Eventually somebody will get tired of getting hit in the head and give up. Or, we just let folks go wild and somebody can get viciously stabbed with a short sword. Either way.
But, I guess the problem is this would instantly make these folks famous. So folks would be picking fights on Twitter just so they could get into the Coliseum and then become #1 on Instagram. Fuck, my idea sucks. It solves nothing.
Hmm, how about instead of bloodsports, we adopt the ancient Mayan or Aztec custom of human sacrifice? If two people threaten each other on the train or Twitter, they get tossed into a cenote, or have their heart ripped out on the steps of the Supreme Court?